Tag Archives: Turkey

Gezi Park, 2013: The Emergence of the Istanbul Consensus

Screen Shot 2013-06-10 at 20.33.38

The international media coverage of the ongoing protests in Turkey have largely struggled to make sense of what is in many respects an unprecedented situation, much less discern a deeper meaning in a movement that began as a simple sit-in demonstration by around fifty people who objected to the razing of an Istanbul park to make way for a shopping mall. But as the remarkably peaceful protests enter their second week, we at Mediolana think that for a variety of reasons there is something profoundly important about these developments – events which in their own way could prove to be even more consequential than the Arab Spring, and in themselves constitute an ‘Istanbul Consensus’:

1. Post-Beijing. When a handful of environmentalists protesting against non-consensual economic development in a rapidly-industrialising and increasingly prosperous country are joined by tens of thousands of sympathisers of all ideological hues in a generation-defining movement, this is itself represents a rejection of the Beijing Consensus: the idea that an omniscient state can direct its tax revenues and bank loans into mega-projects carried out in the name of society at large, but which merely reflect the dreams of the powerful.

2. Post-Washington. The fact that there are some groups of people who passionately believe that an urban green space is markedly superior to the construction of yet another cathedral of consumption is nothing less than a spiritual rejection of the Washington Consensus. Indiscriminate privatisation and deregulation which benefit only a select few is seen for what it is: corruption on almost every possible level imaginable.

3. Post-Conflict. At least some postmodern Western societies have attained a measure of social peace in recent decades, but in a post-ideological, post-religious context of disenchantment in which an undercurrent of cynicism is never far from the surface. Conversely, the streets and squares of major Turkish cities have seen nominally passionate social and cultural rivals – from hardline secularists and anti-capitalist Muslims to fans of Fenerbahçe, Galatasaray and Beşiktaş – come together, quite incredibly, under one banner.

Screen Shot 2013-06-10 at 20.40.33

Leave a Comment

Filed under Political Science, Urban Life, Economic Development, Environment

Alcohol Policy in Turkey: The Limitations of Existing Paradigms and the Imperative of Informationalism

Screen Shot 2013-05-25 at 15.54.46Having amassed and pored through a fair bit of research on this very subject in the last few months, it was with some interest that we at Mediolana have been following recent legislative developments in Turkey on the issue of alcohol policy. Following the example of countries such as Sweden, Turkey is looking to regulate various aspects pertaining to the alcohol industry, and a bill was passed by the Turkish parliament earlier this week to this effect. The proposed law – it still has to be ratified by the Turkish President, Abdullah Gül, before it becomes official – contains a mixture of provisions; some of them are world-class, others anything but. However, the abject quality of both the debate surrounding the draft bill and the initial versions of the law evince nothing more than the limitations of at least three longstanding paradigms – with implications that reach far beyond the shores of the Turkish Republic:

1. Existing Policy. On one of his rare holidays, in the summer of 2012 our CSO and Creative Director came across a can of Efes Pilsen on a Cypriot beach. It had all the health information of a bottle of mineral water; unlike containers of alcohol even in a largely-unregulated country such as the UK, there were no warnings about the suitability of the drink for groups such as pregnant women, no unit information, and no medical officer’s warning. Given that at present rates of c.2.25-2.5m global deaths per annum, alcohol will kill up to 250,000,000 this century (World Health Organisation, 2011), and that ethanol is a class 1 carcinogen or cancer-producer, this is exactly the kind of situation that the new legislation should be aiming to remedy.

2. Authoritarian Solutions. Most of the provisions in the final version of the bill voted on by the Turkish parliament are well within the norms of best-practice international legislative standards. But the initial drafts posited by the governing Justice and Development Party (‘AKP’) were riddled with overbearing and unrealistic demands, such as the obfuscation of the consumption of alcohol in open-air eateries. Most disappointingly, the emphasis was on negative restrictions rather than the positive provision of information. Even in model jurisdictions, the ignorance and lack of imagination of alcohol regulators (let alone the general population) on the effects of alcohol consumption is arguably the core problem in this context. The knowledge that even moderate alcohol consumption engenders conditions as diverse as breast cancer and reduced orgasmic capacity and intensity is a much more powerful deterrent to drinking alcohol than whether a bar is placed 99 or 101 metres from an educational establishment.

3. Cultural Wars. Turkey’s main opposition party – the Republican People’s Party (‘CHP’) – yet again demonstrated the limitations of an approach based almost entirely on adversarial politics, in this case via ‘exposing’ another political party’s ‘secret agenda’. Whilst happy to water down the AKP’s proposals, they proffered no model of their own, let alone a recognition that individual and corporate liberties at some point do intersect and conflict with the public interest. Their lack of knowledge as to just how seriously many Western jurisdictions treat this issue ended up undermining their credibility. As our CSO recalls from his early career as a football journalist, not even the hosting of the 1998 FIFA World Cup made France change their strict laws regarding alcohol and sports sponsorship: official FIFA sponsor Budweiser was barred from the tournament, their advertising space instead being allocated to Tokyo-headquartered electronics company Casio.

Screen Shot 2013-05-25 at 15.52.48

Leave a Comment

Filed under Law, Political Science

The Sky’s the Limit: Champions League ‘Finalists’ Borussia Dortmund Ink Airline Marketing Agreement!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Business, Economics, Football, Marketing

Turkey’s Future Options: EU, SCO, OIC or TIU?

Screen Shot 2013-04-14 at 23.57.12

Back in 2007, our Creative Director & CSO Asad Yawar foresaw the rise of Turkey – something not even on the global international relations agenda at the peak of the Euro-American credit bubble – as having ‘far-reaching implications…for Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East’.

Since that time, Turkey has been the only major European economy aside from Germany and oil-rich Russia to come close to transcending the global economic crisis. But its longstanding trajectory of joining the European Union – a goal which was confirmed with Turkey’s official bid to join the European Economic Community almost exactly twenty-six years ago – does not look nearly as attractive as it might have done even five years ago. A condition of Turkey’s EU accession is the eventual replacement of the Turkish lira with the much-maligned euro; given the experiences of present eurozone periphery countries, where even sacrosanct pillars of private property such as bank deposits and gold have become collateral damage in a financial armageddon, it is doubtful whether a country which could in theory gain many of the benefits of European Union membership without actually joining would choose to take the obvious risk constituted by signing up to the EU.

With an ever-growing international reach – Turkey’s foreign aid budget nearly doubled from 2011 (US$1.3bn) to 2012 (US$2.5bn) – the state that contains the former imperial capital of the Ottoman Empire clearly has options regarding its future alliances. But what, if any are the alternatives to the EU? After some contemplation, we at Mediolana came up with the following:

1. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. This international bloc – ironically headquartered in Beijing – is fundamentally a Eurasian security alliance. While the current Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has openly stated his keenness on joining the SCO, these sentiments do not appear to be shared even by other senior figures in his own AK Party, and it is easy to see why. Totally dominated by Russia and China and offering little in terms of environmental or human rights standards, Turkey would have little leverage within this grouping and would have no additional incentives at all to improve two of its (presently) weaker areas.

2. Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Historically one of the great sleeping giants of international relations, the OIC should in theory be an arena where Turkey, which is already a member state, can further its goals. And from 2005 to date, a period when Professor Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu has been Secretary-General of the OIC, Turkish influence within the organisation has been palpable. However, Turkey has not traditionally enjoyed a prominent position within a largely ineffectual organisation that has been characterised by the power struggle between Saudi Arabia and Iran. The forthcoming supplanting of the present Secretary-General by Saudi former journalist Iyad bin Amin Madani means that the OIC is unlikely to adopt a Turkish agenda in the medium term.

3. Turkish-Islamic Union. This is an international bloc which presently does not formally exist but which is being heavily promoted on A9, a Turkish television station established in 2011. This fact alone would not normally qualify it for serious consideration, but judging from the calibre of people from the worlds of academia, journalism, business and politics that have already been interviewed by this channel and who have expressed a desire to see Turkey take on this type of leadership role within the Islamic world, A9 seems to have an influence disproportionately large compared to its modest audience share. The main advantage of this grouping for Turkey is that it would get to design the institutional architecture from the TIU’s inception, which in theory could make it much more functional than, say, the OIC or EU; while the provisional name of the organisation is unlikely to inspire Arabs or Persians, the essential concept deserves consideration.

Screen Shot 2013-04-14 at 23.52.49

4 Comments

Filed under Economics, Media, Political Science

Happy Newroz, War is Over: PKK Leader Declares Ceasefire!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economics, Political Science, Politics

Returned With Interest: VakıfBank Crowned European Champions!

Screen Shot 2013-03-12 at 12.13.35

Leave a Comment

Filed under Business, Economics

IP Numbers: China Now World’s Number One Patent Applicant!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Business, Creativity, Economic Development, Economics, Technology

Never A Borrower Be: Turkey ‘Becoming Net Creditor’ of the International Monetary Fund!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economic Development, Economics

Liechtenstein, the British Virgin Islands…Turkey? Sneijder Transfer Highlights Long-Standing Tax Quirk

2 Comments

Filed under Football, Law

History Will Teach Us Nothing: Overdevelopment Undermining ‘Turkish Model’

2 Comments

Filed under Environment, Urban Life